Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Amendment 3 topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Auburndale officials warn Amendment 3 could cut $2.1 million from city revenue in year one

City Commission of the City of Auburndale · July 20, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City staff told the Auburndale Commission that the Polk County Property Appraiser projects a $2.1 million loss to the city's ad valorem revenue in year one if Amendment 3 passes; commissioners asked staff for detailed fiscal scenarios and long-range impacts.

City Manager Jeffrey Brown opened a special workshop July 20 to "discuss potential budget impacts to the City's budget as it relates to Amendment 3," laying out an initial forecast for the city.

Brown told commissioners the City receives about $12 million in ad valorem property tax and that roughly 80% of that funding supports public safety. He said the Polk County Property Appraiser "expects a $2.1 million loss to the City on year one should Amendment 3 be passed," and presented Florida Department of Revenue projections and anticipated future exemption rates used in the analysis.

Commissioners pressed for additional detail about the analysis and implications. Commissioner Travis Avery asked for historical appraisal data and whether the amendment's required phase-out plan had been provided; Brown and City Attorney Frederick J. Murphy Jr. answered that current modeling assumes indexing to the consumer price index. The Commission asked staff to produce scenario tables showing how homestead changes, exemption growth, or a full phase-out would affect revenues over multiple years.

The workshop record shows commissioners prioritized next steps that include a deeper look at revenue scenarios rather than immediate policy changes. The Commission did not vote on any ordinance or millage change at the meeting and instead directed staff to return with more precise financial breakdowns and options for bridging potential shortfalls.