Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves Strathmore rezoning for 168 homes after contested hearing on schools, roads and wetlands
Summary
After extended public testimony and debate over Vin Hill Road safety, school capacity and environmental impacts, the Board approved a Brookfield/Strathmore rezoning for 168 homes (151 market, 17 committed affordable) and proffers for transportation, schools and open‑space protections; vote 6–2.
The Prince William County Board of Supervisors narrowly approved a rezoning for the Strathmore (Brookfield) development in the Vint Hill corridor on Nov. 18 by a 6–2 vote, following several hours of technical presentations, staff briefings and a packed public hearing with dozens of in‑person and remote commenters.
Applicant Sherman Patrick described the proposal as a 55‑acre suburban development at roughly 3 units per acre: "There will be 151 market rate dwelling units and there will be affordable...17 units," he said, listing proffers that include a $5,000 per‑unit school contribution, a $75 per‑acre water‑quality monitoring contribution, a per‑unit fire‑rescue fee and a dedication of land to extend the Bridal Run Linear Trail. The plan preserves about 46% open space, the applicant said.
Planning staff recommended approval, finding the density consistent with the comprehensive plan and noting coordinated steps among several applicants in the corridor to create a joint development agreement (JDA) for Vin Hill Road improvements. Transportation staff explained the proposal’s frontage improvements and a corridor concept — including two proposed roundabouts and a 120‑foot right‑of‑way standard with a 10‑foot shared‑use path on both sides — to be phased through a joint agreement.
Speakers at the public hearing split between neighbors raising safety, traffic and watershed concerns and proponents urging housing supply and workforce options. Neighbors pressed officials about a large white‑oak specimen tree located near the property line, wetlands impacts, the timing of road construction and whether school capacity would be adequate. County staff and the applicant said some mitigation and monitoring are proffered; county environmental staff and the applicant said wetlands impacts would follow state and federal permitting and that the design clustered lots to preserve open space.
Several board members and the applicant emphasized the collaborative cross‑developer approach to ensure road improvements are built before or alongside home construction. Opponents warned that widening would be necessary only because private projects add traffic and raised concerns about eminent domain language in the proffers; proponents, including board supporters, said the project helps address the regional housing shortage and includes a mix of housing types and committed affordable units.
After debate Supervisor Gordy moved approval; the motion passed 6–2 with Supervisors Vega and Stewart voting no. The board recorded implementation steps including a JDA for road phasing, monitoring of tree protections and proffered contributions to schools and parks.
