Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Lake Improvement District topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Mission Lakes LID petition draws hours of public comment; county schedules vote for Dec. 16
Summary
At a statutorily required public hearing, Mission Lakes residents expressed strong, split views on a proposed Lake Improvement District (LID). Supporters cited steady funding for invasive aquatic species control and lake stewardship; opponents questioned fairness of boundaries, petitioning process and herbicide use. The board closed the hearing and will consider a resolution on Dec. 16.
Crow Wing County held a public hearing Nov. 25 on a petition to create the Mission Lakes Improvement District (LID), and public comment split between those who said a district would provide consistent funding for invasive species control and those who questioned the petition's fairness and treatment methods.
"The creation of a lid will result in an equal and consistent sharing of the cost of the resources needed to improve Mission Lakes for the benefit of all residents, visitors and Brainerd Lakes tourists," said John Zoey, president of the Mission Lake Association. He told the board the petition met county policy thresholds and urged commissioners to advance the process.
Opponents urged caution. Kevin Schmidt, a long-time Upper Mission resident, said state assessments show Upper and Lower Mission are in different condition and argued the proposed assessment would unfairly shift Lower Mission costs onto Upper Mission property owners: "This LID petition would be tabled," he said, urging the board to reconsider the boundaries and necessity.
Other public speakers pressed procedural and environmental questions. Several asked whether association meetings were inclusive and how the petitioner reached seasonal residents; others raised concerns about herbicide use, noting evolving state reviews of chemical approvals. Land services staff (Jessica) reminded the board that no vote was being taken that day and that findings of fact and statutory checklists in the packet (page 245) will guide the Dec. 16 decision. She also clarified that, under the proposed petition structure, the assessment cannot exceed the stated $250 without a new petition, though some LIDs adopt alternate petition structures that allow annual increases through local votes.
After extensive testimony the board closed the hearing and scheduled formal action for its Dec. 16 meeting, with staff recommending commissioners use the statutory findings of fact to decide whether the petition meets the county's legal and policy requirements.
