Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Assessment Equity topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident urges clearer limits, equity after Kimball Lake petition
Summary
At the public hearing on changing Kimball Lake's assessment model, resident Daniel Yavner supported lake protection but raised concerns that a flat-per-lot assessment may unfairly burden properties with low assessed values or that cannot access the shoreline; he asked how surplus funds would be handled.
During the Nov. 12 public hearing on the Kimball Lake Improvement District petition, resident Daniel (Dan) Yavner said he "supports the efforts of the board to protect the lake" but asked how any additional funds collected under a flexible assessment would be used and governed.
Yavner noted that under the current flat-per-lot assessment structure, homeowners with lower property tax bills could face a much larger relative surcharge. "My taxes are $1,100 a year. On top of that, there is a $200 a year assessment for the LID. That's nearly a 20% surcharge," he said, and warned that raising the assessment could reach "a 50% surcharge" depending on the LID proposal. He asked whether the LID would specify that extra funds be reserved for responses to particular infestations or whether they could be repurposed.
County staff and commissioners directed Yavner to raise procedural or allocation concerns with the LID board and attend the association's annual meeting where members vote on assessment levels. Land Services staff said the county reviews LID budgets and allowed expenses but does not approve or deny individual LID assessment amounts when a petition requests flexible assessment authority.
