Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Construction Time Limits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council denies CTL appeal for 431 Golden Gate, imposes $339,600 penalty
Summary
After a lengthy hearing, the council denied an appeal of construction-time-limit penalties for 431 Golden Gate Avenue. Staff recommended 287 days of relief; the council granted that relief plus an additional 12 days (total relief 299 days) and imposed a final penalty of $339,600.
The council denied the construction-time-limit (CTL) appeal for 431 Golden Gate Avenue and imposed a final CTL penalty of $339,600 after an extensive public hearing and deliberation.
Building official Brian summarized staff’s CTL analysis: the permit carried an 18-month CTL with a 6-month extension; staff found the project was 627 days over the prescribed deadline and recommended partial relief of 287 days for specified events they judged beyond the owner’s control (32 days for PG&E delay in final connection, 58 days for a Marin Municipal Water District infrastructure leak and 197 days for documented family illnesses). “Staff recommends … total relief of 287 days totaling $344,400 and imposing a total penalty of $354,000,” the building official said as he presented the staff recommendation.
Property owner Marshall Miller and his team argued a longer list of delays — 18 distinct events in their analysis — were outside their control, including continuing COVID-era supply-chain problems, discovery of dry rot that required extended structural work, a turret reconstruction, subcontractor and cabinet delays, and flooding and mold remediation of the lower level. “We were a total of 627 days over the CTL,” Miller told the council, asking that the cumulative delays reduce the penalty to zero.
An expert witness offered a delay-allocation methodology intended to avoid overlapping credits and to quantify the owner’s estimate of impact. Council members asked detailed procedural questions about the owner-builder permit, the use and timing of design-review exemptions, inspection scheduling around holidays, contractor oversight, and emergency-related closures. Several council members stressed the statutory and policy distinction between delays caused by uncontrollable external events and delays arising from project decisions or contractor performance.
After deliberation, the council adopted staff’s recommended relief and added 12 days for a holiday/inspection scheduling issue (bringing total relief to 299 days), and the council approved a motion to deny the appeal and impose a final CTL penalty of $339,600. The council directed staff to bring a final resolution for consent-calendar adoption at the next meeting. The decision was unanimous on the motion recorded at the meeting.
