Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Stadium Authority topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Stadium authority seeks unlocking of $49.5M for preconstruction planning; HCDA backs combined bill

House Committee on Water & Land · March 18, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Stadium Authority and HCDA asked the committee to unlock $49.5 million in preconstruction planning funds to advance demolition and planning in a proposed stadium district; HCDA urged making district-improvement items aspirational guidelines rather than hard statutory requirements.

The Stadium Authority's executive director, Mike Yedow, and HCDA representatives presented in support of SB 2599 SD2, which combines several development-related bills and includes provisions to enable stadium construction and community development planning.

Mike Yedow said the authority has county support, private financing and contracts in place and that access to $49,500,000 in preconstruction planning funds is a critical next step to ensure private partners can proceed. "What we do need is access to the $49,500,000 in pre-construction planning in that special fund," Yedow said, and he asked the committee to formalize HCDA's role in the district.

HCDA testified it supports the bills and recommended moving a list of desired district features (parks, arts, museums) into aspirational guidelines rather than statutory requirements to avoid implementation burdens. Committee members asked about public cost, ticket pricing and local benefits; the Stadium Authority said pricing strategies will consider accessibility for University of Hawaii events and public uses while noting most projects of this scale rely on public-private partnerships.

The committee recorded votes on SB 2599 and moved it forward with committee amendments; some members registered reservations and a no vote was recorded on the record for district funding philosophy.