Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Finance director says FY2025 ended with ~$10.2M cash; council presses for reconciliation of carryovers and amended budgets

City of Redding City Council · September 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Finance Director presented a year-end review showing an estimated June 30 cash balance near $10.2M (audit pending), $3.7M below projections, and several revenue variances (sales tax down ~$1.3M; property tax +$500k; FEMA SAFER reimbursement ~$2.2M pending). Council members pressed for reconciliations of amended/adopted budgets and carryovers.

Finance Director presented the City of Redding’s fiscal-year-end review for FY2025, walking council through general-fund cash, revenue variances and a crosswalk between the prior 10‑year forecast and the newly adopted 10‑year plan.

Key figures given in the presentation: an estimated actual cash balance as of June 30 of about $10.2 million (audit not complete), a forecasted beginning cash for the new 10‑year plan of about $9.0 million, and an overall shortfall of roughly $3.7 million versus internal projections for the fiscal year. The director listed major revenue variances: sales tax came in about $1.3 million under projection for the year, property tax outperformed estimates by about $500,000, TOT was about $300,000 below projection, and building- and permit-related fees were also below expectations. He also noted the city expects a FEMA SAFER grant reimbursement of roughly $2.2 million but is waiting for federal billing system updates tied to the city's consolidated UEI number.

Council members pressed staff on transparency in the new reporting extracts — specifically, how the 'amended-with-carryovers' figures reconcile with the adopted/amended budget lines that council traditionally reviewed. One council member requested returning with a columnar reconciliation showing adopted budget, amended budget, carryovers and encumbrances so that year-to-year and quarter-to-quarter comparisons are clearer. Finance staff agreed to produce a more detailed reconciliation and to explore returning monthly-level detail if council requests it.

The presentation also listed department budget requests (for example: police retirements cash‑outs ~$631,000; fire requests for retirements and negotiated increases ~ $773,000; parking loan $232,000) and discussed internal service fund adjustments that may be brought as part of the supplemental budget.