Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Town Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Weathersfield adopts Town Plan amid concerns over Act 181 and flood-resiliency language
Summary
After a second public hearing that drew detailed comments on legal alignment and flood-resiliency language, the Selectboard voted 3–1 to adopt the Town Plan as presented and asked the Planning Commission to address flood resiliency and forest-block development language in a phase 2 amendment.
The Weathersfield Selectboard voted 3–1 to adopt the Town Plan and maps at its July 27 meeting after a second public hearing that drew multiple detailed comments from residents and participants.
During the hearing, Dr. Murray said he had supplied roughly "fifteen (15) pages of comments and suggestions and that only one (1) had been accepted," and urged the board to consider conflicts between the plan and recent state legislation (Act 181 and S.325). John Broker Campbell and several commenters raised concerns that parts of the plan—particularly flood-resiliency goals and language about development in forest blocks—were vague or prescriptive. Town staff said the draft had been reviewed by Mt. Ascutney Regional Commission (MARC) for consistency with regional planning and state statute, and that many of the plan's "shall" statements reflect statutory language or directions to specific boards and commissions.
After deliberation and a brief technical interruption to Zoom service, the board moved to adopt the plan with a recommendation that the Planning Commission address the flood-resiliency goals and examine prohibition language regarding development in forest blocks as part of phase 2 edits and amendments. The motion (made by Mrs. Bearse, seconded by Ms. Henderson) passed with a 3–1 vote and one member absent. Minutes record that the board debated whether to require a full legal review now and noted that a legal review after the hearing could amount to new testimony.
