Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Tax Law topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Legal counsel: supermajority needed only for large tax hikes; transcript contains inconsistent phrasing

Shelby County Budget & Finance Subcommittee · January 15, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Legislative counsel told the subcommittee the Shelby County charter requires a supermajority only if the commission increases the tax rate by 10¢ or more from the prior year; transcript also includes counsel framing the threshold as a roughly 10% change, creating a wording inconsistency commissioners asked to clarify.

Commissioner Ford asked what vote threshold the charter requires if the commission seeks to increase the tax rate after a rollback. Legislative counsel addressed the question on the record: "The charter only requires the super majority vote if you are increasing the tax rate by 10¢ or more from the previous year," counsel said. Later counsel restated the threshold as a percentage while answering, saying an increase of over 10% (which the speaker estimated at about 33.9¢ based on the current $3.39 rate) would trigger the supermajority requirement.

Commissioner Ford pressed for clarity about whether the trigger is computed from the certified rate or the prior year’s adopted rate; counsel confirmed the charter references the prior year’s rate, not the not-yet-certified figure. The exchange included an explicit admonition that returning a rolled-back rate to the prior level is legally considered a tax increase and would count toward the charter threshold.

Because the transcript records both a 10¢ formulation and a roughly 10% formulation from counsel in adjacent lines, the legal phrasing requires follow-up for exact drafting and to ensure the commission applies the correct test when considering rate action.

No formal action was taken during the meeting; counsel’s clarification will need to be captured in any motion that proposes a change to the rate later in the budget process.