Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Accessory Dwelling topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rankin County supervisors approve conversion of shop to accessory dwelling at 101 Lakeview with inspections, fee penalty and non‑rental condition
Summary
The board granted Rhonda Spearman a conditional‑use permit to reclassify a converted shop at 101 Lakeview Road as an accessory dwelling unit, subject to inspections, doubled permit fees for the prior misclassification and a prohibition on renting the unit; the board also authorized counsel to pursue missed ad valorem taxes for up to seven years.
The Rankin County Board of Supervisors voted Aug. 3 to grant a conditional‑use permit allowing the conversion of an existing 1,800‑square‑foot shop on roughly five acres at 101 Lakeview Road (District 4) to an accessory dwelling unit (ADU), but attached several conditions intended to correct a prior permitting discrepancy.
Staff explained that the structure had been permitted in 2018 as a shop, inspected and approved in that category, and later converted into living space. The staff member told the board that the county's process when a permitted use does not match actual construction is to require additional inspections and to charge the proper fee plus a penalty: "the applicant not only pay the fee that should have been required to begin with, but also the doubling of that fee as a penalty for the failure to disclose accurately what this dwelling unit would be," the staff member said.
The board's motion, offered by Supervisor Gaines, approved the ADU classification with these conditions: required dwelling‑style inspections to ensure safety, a written record of the board's conditions in county files, an indemnity acknowledgement for inspections the county cannot complete, and an explicit prohibition on renting the structures (the board stressed preference that occupancy be by family members). The motion passed by voice vote.
The board additionally agreed to direct county legal staff to pursue any escaped ad valorem taxes that may be owing as a result of the misclassification, dating back up to seven years; staff noted Mississippi law allows review of prior assessments in that window. A county official said such a collection could be added to closing or paid by the owner prior to transfer.
Applicant and owner representatives told the board the property's original intent was multi‑generational family occupancy. The owner said the shop was converted to accommodate family members and that the current buyers intend to use the property as a family residence. Neighbors had raised concerns about signage saying "rezoning," lack of notice, and the possibility the ADU could later operate as a short‑term rental; the board explicitly prohibited short‑term rental as a condition of approval.
The action resolves the permitting mismatch for the pending real‑estate transaction but requires the owner to complete the inspections and any fee adjustments before the county will record the ADU classification.
