Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Comprehensive Plan Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Purcellville planning commission catalogs most amendments, advances mapping, historic and transportation items
Summary
At its comprehensive plan five‑year review, the Purcellville Planning Commission cataloged the majority of 21 proposed amendments and advanced several substantive items — including a Hurst West mapping change, a new North End focus area, historic‑resource map updates and two transportation corrections — for further drafting and future vote.
The Purcellville Planning Commission spent its meeting reviewing 21 proposed amendments to the town comprehensive plan, cataloging many editorial or technical fixes and advancing a handful of policy-relevant changes for further work.
Vice Chair (facilitator) outlined the two‑gate process the commission used: gate one tests whether an amendment corrects an error or omission; gate two asks whether a change would have a significant impact on the town. Items judged to be technical or not to change policy were cataloged for future cycles; items meeting both gates were advanced for redlines, additional drafting, or later vote.
Subcommittees recommended cataloging most map corrections, editorial text changes, and reorganization proposals. Examples cataloged included adding a missing future‑land‑use sidebar entry for “single family detached — traditional” and several map color/parcel corrections the commission characterized as error/omission fixes.
Several items were advanced for further action. The commission advanced a Hurst West mapping amendment to create a commercial neighborhood‑scale subarea on parcels east of Hatcher Avenue, citing proximity to the planned Route 7690 interchange and the potential to influence future development character. Commissioners also advanced an amendment to create a new “North End” focus area north of Route 7, and a set of historic‑resource presentation changes (including options to rework an overcrowded map and add an appendix/list of historic properties).
Linked transportation amendments were advanced as well: the commission agreed to remove a proposed Northern Collector Road segment from the plan and to recommend against extending Mayfair Crown Drive westward (a change the subcommittee argued would prevent through‑traffic that could endanger a residential neighborhood). Other transportation and affordable‑housing callouts labeled as short‑term efforts were treated as NA (not acted on) or cataloged and deferred for separate work.
The commission flagged remaining issues for redlines, public hearing scheduling, and future deliberation; staff (Bridal) was tasked with tracking original and new amendment numbering as the group moves items toward a May meeting and potential public hearing. The commission adjourned after tabling a separate STR/bed‑and‑breakfast discussion to a future meeting.
