Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council weighs changing canal-edge fencing rules, some members urge caution
Summary
Councilmembers debated whether to loosen the 2015 code that requires 6-foot solid precast concrete fencing next to canals; several members asked staff to return with cost and strength comparisons and suggested talking to canal companies, while others opposed changes that could affect previously approved developments.
The council discussed possible revisions to the city'9s fencing ordinance that currently requires 6-foot decorative, solid-core precast concrete fencing along canals, ditches, and irrigation lines. Planning staff reviewed the 2015 amendment that tightened material and color standards; councilmembers expressed differing views about safety, aesthetics and developer costs.
Planning staff explained, "We specifically require along, ditches, canals, or other irrigation lines, which is basically most of the waterways in the city. 6 foot high decorative solid core pre precast concrete," and noted the code excludes hollow foam-core alternatives. Some councilmembers asked staff to provide comparisons of other masonry alternatives and cost-per-linear-foot estimates; others warned that changes should not be retroactive and could be unfair to residents who approved developments under the current standard. The city attorney'9s office (on the record) told the council that canal companies historically have limited liability and little regulatory control over fences outside their easements, which shaped the discussion.
Why it matters: fence material and design rules can affect development costs, trail aesthetics along canals, and maintenance/weed-control practices for canal companies. Staff will return with options, technical strength comparisons, and suggested ordinance language if the council wants to pursue amendments.
