Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Labor Relations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission defers compensation-policy change after dispute over MOU language
Summary
A resolution to amend the county compensation policy was deferred after trustees, HR and union representatives disagreed on language that electors say would reinstate prior wording and a clause HR says contradicts negotiated MOUs.
A proposed amendment to the FY2024–25 county compensation policy prompted multiple speakers to press for clearer MOU protections and process review, and commissioners deferred the item to the next committee meeting so stakeholders can meet.
Regina Newman, County Trustee, said the elected officials wanted the policy language to revert to prior years so negotiated provisions in MOUs would not be overridden. Nicholas Nibley, speaking for his union, objected to a clause he read from the current draft that he said would allow the compensation policy to govern in the event of a conflict with bargaining-unit MOUs: "If we've sat down and we negotiate and we've agreed on something, and then you just say, okay, well, the compensation policy is going to override what we've negotiated," he said, arguing that negotiated MOUs should control.
Gerald Thornton, Director of Human Resources, responded that the electors submitted an abbreviated version late and that the document the trustees provided reflected their suggested language; Thornton also said the county must follow civil-service procedures and that the item needs to go to the Civil Service Commission first. Commissioners voted to send the item to the February 5 committee meeting so the parties can reconcile language and present a substitute resolution.
