Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pressurized Irrigation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council debates pressurized‑irrigation mapping, county modifiers and commercial rates
Summary
Council members questioned whether mapped lots, irrigated-area methodology and county modifiers produce equitable PI and commercial culinary charges; staff proposed options to grandfather currently mapped properties or allow owners to choose between legacy mapping and a new tiered structure.
Get email alerts on the Pressurized Irrigation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The American Fork Council spent substantial time on Tuesday weighing how to treat pressurized irrigation (PI) and nonresident accounts under a proposed rate restructure. Staff explained residential lots have historically used gross-lot area for base calculations, while Table 5 would calculate rates from irrigated area; mapping residential lots would be unusual and costly, staff said. Council Member Ryan Hunter urged options for large-lot residents who deliberately leave portions of their land un‑irrigated to avoid penalizing conservation choices.
Council also discussed county nonresidential accounts, which historically were intended to pay double rates because they do not contribute property-tax revenue; staff said the current modifier still indicates “double,” but actual per‑thousand‑gallon tier rates for some county accounts match residential levels and staff will verify the original policy. Mr. Bunker proposed letting currently mapped residents choose to remain mapped or adopt the new tiered structure, and staff suggested a modest renewal or spot‑check auditing fee to enable periodic verification of mapped areas. PI proposed rates were discussed as proposed to take effect Jan. 1, 2027, with public review before implementation.
