Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Surveillance Flock Camera topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident urges Germantown to deactivate PTZ 'Flock' camera pending review
Summary
Brian Sparrow told the committee that a newly installed Flock PTZ camera overlooking a playground and backyards is overly intrusive and lacks auditing and public vetting; he asked the village to cover or deactivate it, present documented need and alternatives, solicit public feedback beyond social media, and adopt an independent auditing policy.
Brian Sparrow, a Germantown resident, told the committee the newly installed Flock PTZ camera at Kinderburg Park is "far more than a fixed vandalism deterrent," citing round-the-clock operation, AI alerts, remote pan/tilt/zoom and 32x zoom capabilities and urging the village to pause activation while the system is reviewed.
Sparrow said the department described the device as an ordinary security camera on social media, omitting key capabilities and limiting residents' ability to provide informed feedback. He said the village does not control the system end-to-end, that Flock's platform is designed for broad law-enforcement access, and pointed to recent Wisconsin incidents where authorized users misused the system. He asked the committee to (1) cover or deactivate the camera during a review, (2) present documented need and alternatives and a cost–benefit analysis, (3) solicit public input beyond Facebook, and (4) adopt published audit and transparency standards for surveillance systems.
Committee members acknowledged the concerns; staff said the camera was already in inventory and under contract and that some LPR contracts did not list this camera. Chief Delaine and staff described existing access-log review practices but Sparrow and trustees called for clearer, independent auditing standards before broader activation.
