Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Procurement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Cleveland County awards detainee safety monitoring and disinfection equipment contracts, accepts other bids for tabulation

Cleveland County Board of County Commissioners · June 23, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board awarded a detainee safety monitoring contract to Custody Protect 4 Sight Labs and approved purchase/installation of a hypochlorous acid generator for the county detention center while accepting and tabulating multiple other bids for inmate food, commissary and a county remodel project.

On June 23 the Cleveland County commissioners awarded BID #SHE-2152 for detainee safety monitoring to Custody Protect 4 Sight Labs, Inc., and awarded BID #SHE-2157 to Service Wing Organic Solutions, LLC, to purchase and install a hypochlorous acid generator at the F. DeWayne Beggs Detention Center. Both awards were made upon the recommendation of Purchasing and carried by unanimous vote.

During the same meeting Purchasing Officer Keri Lyles opened multiple bids the board accepted for tabulation and qualification: BID #CC-2154 (Court Clerk breakroom and civil clerk area remodel) and BID #SHE-2158/2159 (one-year inmate food and inmate commissary services). Vendors who submitted bids included LG Contracting & Building LLC; Precision Builders LLC; Sun Construction Services; Benchmark Government Solutions; Trinity Services Group, Inc.; Keefe Commissary Network, LLC; Commissary Express Inc.; and others. Commissioners deferred award decisions on those items and instructed Purchasing to present a tabulation and qualification report at a later meeting.

The board also postponed awarding or rejecting bids for BID #BE-2155 (one-year building maintenance supplies contract) and directed that decisions on that procurement be returned to the board after further review. The meeting minutes record that all motions to award and to postpone were carried by a 3–0 vote.