Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the School Bond topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council opens discussion on $241.84 million school bond; finance director explains premium, refunding and use of proceeds

Auburn City Council · July 24, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council members questioned the structure and use of proceeds for an ordinance to authorize $241,840,000 in general-obligation warrants (series 2026) for school projects; Finance Director Allison Edge outlined why the sale produced premium proceeds and how refunded bond savings and interest earnings would be allocated.

The Auburn City Council opened discussion of an ordinance to authorize $241,840,000 in general-obligation warrants, series 2026, intended for public school projects.

“Allison Edge, our finance director, explained that when bonds are issued in the bond market, they are issued in a variety of ways. Some are at par amount, some are at discounts, some are at premiums,” Edge said, describing how premium sales yield more cash up front and reduce the par amount the city must issue. Council members asked for detail on the transaction: the packet showed roughly $40,600,000 in refunded bonds and about $214,600,000 directed to the school project, producing roughly $255,000,000 in cash proceeds versus the stated par amount.

City staff told the council that refunded-bond savings and premium proceeds are expected to replenish the city's dedicated 5-mill fund and be applied to upcoming projects including Richland Park and, if available, portions of a planned junior high. On investing proceeds pending contractor payouts, Edge said the city follows a safety-first policy and will use U.S. Treasury–only money-market vehicles that comply with tax-exempt bond spend-down rules.

Representatives from the city’s underwriting and advisory team described market timing and the decision to go to market. A Frasier Lanier adviser and an underwriter praised the finance staff's decision to proceed amid volatile markets: “Allison made the gutsy right call and we had a very successful sale,” an underwriting representative said, and they estimated that moving forward saved roughly 15 basis points compared with alternatives—about $255,000 a year or roughly $7.65 million over the issue’s life.

Staff also noted that Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s visited Auburn before the sale; S&P’s commentary described the city as having a "double A plus" rating driven by healthy financial performance and reserve levels, and Moody’s assigned an AA2 rating, both citing conservative budgeting and revenue strength.

The council introduced the ordinance and took public questions of staff during the meeting. The transcript documents the introduction and extended discussion; a final roll-call result on Ordinance 9A is not recorded in the transcript provided to this report.