Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Twisp Family Haven Hearing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning Commission continues Twisp Family Haven hearing after residents raise notice concerns

Town of Twisp Planning Commission · January 15, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After residents said the legal notice was difficult to find, the Planning Commission voted to continue the Catholic Family Charities Twisp Family Haven hearing for up to two weeks; the next meeting is scheduled for Jan. 29, 2025 at 5:00 p.m.

The Town of Twisp Planning Commission voted Jan. 15 to continue the public hearing on Catholic Family Charities’ Twisp Family Haven planned development after several members of the public said the legal notice for the hearing was difficult to find.

Commissioner Michael Bastian moved to continue the hearing for no more than two weeks; Commissioner Miles Milliken seconded the motion. The motion passed with Commissioners Art Tasker and Anna Rose voting in favor and Commissioner Rachel Levi voting against. The hearing was continued at 8:15 p.m., and the commission set the next meeting for Jan. 29, 2025, at 5:00 p.m.

Public commenters told the commission they had trouble locating the newspaper notice and only saw a posting at Town Hall and the post office about 24 hours before the meeting. Isabelle Spohn asked the commission to postpone the hearing so commissioners and members of the public could review materials more thoroughly; Paula Mackrow said she reviewed the paper and could not find the ad. Mackrow also recounted that Deputy Clerk Davis had told her, "The notice was put out appropriately," which Mackrow described as a rushed response.

Commissioners did not take final action on the Twisp Family Haven proposal during the Jan. 15 meeting; by voting to continue, the commission preserved the opportunity for additional public input before any final decision.