Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Myrtle Street Subdivision topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Public raises drainage, tree-clearing and boundary concerns as Board continues Myrtle Street subdivision hearing

Hillsborough Planning Board · January 7, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

An application to re‑subdivide Myrtle Street into 10 lots prompted public concerns about buildable area, a missing 'triangle' annexation, drainage maintenance, road width, sidewalks, and tree clearing; the Planning Board continued the hearing to Jan. 21, 2026.

Planning Director Robyn Payson introduced an application to re-subdivide previously approved lots on Myrtle Street into 10 lots (Map 11P & 23 Lots 191 & 113). Peter Mellen summarized the property history and said the applicant, Leigh Bosse, will provide municipal water to each lot; the plan shows test pits and buildable areas. Dana Clow asked about setbacks around the wetland and Jim Bailey questioned whether the road met the required 20-foot width; Peter Mellen said the road was not 20 feet and would need revision.

During the public hearing neighbors raised several concerns. Christine Anderson, a recent arrival, asked whether the whole lot would be clear‑cut and said she was worried about noise, dust and impacts to wildlife. Richard Head, Conservation Commission chair, asked who would hold and maintain the stormwater easement; Peter Mellen said the intent in 2023 was to convey the drainage easement to the Town once the road was taken over. Jesse Lucas said a small triangular parcel shown on the previous (2023) plan was never deeded and remains unresolved; the Board agreed the plan was not ready for approval and continued the public hearing to Jan. 21, 2026 so the applicant can resolve the 'triangle' and other outstanding issues.

The Board accepted the application as complete, appointed Cathy Houle to sit for an absent member, and then voted to continue the public hearing. Members recommended conditions and asked the applicant to clarify road width, sidewalk provision, drainage maintenance responsibility, buildable areas, and whether tree clearing would occur.