Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure And Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County adds K‑23 bridge to five‑year plan, approves propane procurement and plan set with one abstention
Summary
Secondary Roads requested adding the K‑23 bridge replacement to the five‑year program (estimated near $1 million); the board approved the addition and related bridge plans with Supervisor Mark abstaining from votes on the bridge items. The board also accepted a propane procurement award (56,525 gallons) to New Century FS (second-lowest bid) to avoid contract language issues with the lowest bidder.
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure And Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Laura Severs, county engineer for Secondary Roads, asked the board to reinstate a previously deferred bridge project (K‑23 over Rock Creek) into the five‑year program, citing a revised estimate near $1 million and describing replacement dimensions: the existing bridge is about 104 feet long and 20 feet wide; the proposed replacement is approximately 150 feet long and 30 feet wide.
Severs told the board the project carries no state or federal funds and is locally funded. “The new estimate puts us near 1000000 dollars, which is able to be budgeted in this year's secondary roads budget,” Severs said. Supervisor Mark explained he would abstain on the bridge votes because the project is close to his residence; the board approved the five‑year program resolution and the bridge plan set 4–0 with one abstention.
The county engineer also presented bids for 56,525 gallons of propane to serve multiple county facilities. Three bids were received (Sapp Brothers at $1.18/gal, New Century FS at $1.19/gal, Johnson Propane at $1.21/gal). Because Sapp Brothers sought contract language the county had not previously accepted, staff recommended taking the second bidder (New Century FS), a difference of roughly $0.01 per gallon; the board approved awarding propane to New Century FS (motion passed 5–0).
The board did not debate project funding sources beyond confirming the project is local and that the engineer's office will manage plans and signage; staff will forward plan sets for signatures and proceed with project scheduling.

