Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cybersecurity topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County declines cybersecurity grant after IT review citing long-term costs
Summary
County IT recommended against accepting a cybersecurity grant because ongoing maintenance and update fees after the grant period would create recurring costs; the board agreed not to pursue the grant.
Get email alerts on the Cybersecurity topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County staff reported back on a previously discussed cybersecurity grant and said the county's IT contractor did not recommend accepting the award because the vendor would require ongoing monthly fees to keep the solution updated after the grant funds expire.
"Our IT company does not recommend that we use it," the presenter said, adding that the county already has an on-premises solution that staff and IT prefer. Commissioners agreed and directed staff not to pursue the grant and to continue relying on their existing IT arrangements.
The board did not take formal fiscal action on the grant but recorded the staff recommendation and declined to proceed based on IT advice; staff will note the decision in grant-tracking records.

