Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rezoning Nagel Road topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Avon planning panel declines to recommend C-4 rezoning for Nagel Road site
Summary
The Avon Planning Commission voted 0–4 on April 15, 2026 to deny a recommendation to rezone about 17.66 acres on Nagel Road from R-1 to C-4 after extended resident opposition over traffic, privacy and prior ballot defeats.
Get email alerts on the Rezoning Nagel Road topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Avon Planning Commission on April 15 declined to recommend rezoning roughly 17.66 acres along Nagel Road from R-1 (single-family residential) to C-4 (general business), rejecting the developer's request by a 0'for'4 vote. The motion to forward a positive recommendation to City Council failed, with Commissioners voting unanimously "no."
Developer Dan Hopkins and Vocon Architects presented a conceptual mixed-use plan with ground-floor retail and second-floor office space and showed renderings meant to illustrate scale and buffers. Hopkins told the commission that the issue had narrowly failed statewide-style balloting previously: "approximately 14,000 total votes were cast, and the measure fell short of passage by only 34 votes," he said, noting the owners had chosen to pursue the formal planning review process rather than petitions.
Residents who spoke during the public hearing said the parcel was purchased and long held as residential and urged the commission not to overturn voter sentiment. Bob Crissinger, whose home backs the property, cited traffic and safety concerns and said the rezoning would "diminish property values and disrupt the residential character of the area." Other neighbors raised consistent themes: noise and light from existing commercial uses on nearby parcels, potential privacy intrusions from multi-story buildings, and skepticism that attractive renderings would match final construction.
Mayor Bryan Jensen and other commissioners said they remained concerned that C-4 entitlements would give developers legal rights to intensify uses in ways the city could not later easily restrict. Jensen noted that little had changed since prior submissions and expressed reluctance to recommend a ballot measure on a proposal that residents had already rejected. The commission's denial means the developer may pursue other legal pathways, but it will not have a positive recommendation from Planning Commission for placement on the next council or ballot schedule.
The commission recorded the roll-call result in the minutes and declared the motion denied; no conditions or amendments were approved.
