Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Police Equipment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commissioners review proposed 10‑year taser lease with Axon; seek usage data and safety evidence

Durham County Board of Commissioners · November 3, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff outlined a proposed 10‑year lease renewal with Axon for replacement and additional taser equipment (approx. $3.1M over 10 years). Commissioners asked for local and national data on taser use, overuse risks and outcomes and for clarifying budget impacts before final approval.

County staff presented a proposed 10‑year contract with Axon (listed in materials at about $3.1 million over 10 years) to replace equipment and add taser units for the Sheriff’s Office and detention facilities. Axon’s regional manager described product lifecycle, a refresh at year 5, and new VR training modules designed to support de‑escalation training.

Julian Brown of Axon said the new agreement “will extend all the way for the next 10 years” and include training modules and device refreshes; he told commissioners the current platform will reach end‑of‑life by 2027. Several commissioners asked for follow‑up data: Commissioner Jacobs requested the sheriff’s office usage data and any local statistics showing whether taser deployment reduced firearm use or produced adverse outcomes. Staff responded they would coordinate with the sheriff’s office and include performance data in follow‑up materials before any final board vote.

Commissioners pressed for clarity on the budget timing and whether the contract simply consolidates previously approved lease payments into a single 10‑year agreement. Staff said first‑year payment is included in the current budget and that some annual lease payments have come back to the board historically for appropriation. No final consent vote on this specific contract was recorded during the public discussion; staff said they will provide the requested data and schedule the item for the board’s upcoming meeting agenda as appropriate.