Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Police Facility topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Duncanville council weighs $50 million police bond as ancillary costs mount

Duncanville City Council · August 5, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council members and outside consultants reviewed options for a new police facility, including a $50 million bond package and lower-cost renovation alternatives, and discussed tax-rate impacts and roughly $8 million in ancillary costs that remain unresolved.

DUNCANVILLE — City officials dug into several options for a new police facility at the Council’s Aug. 4 meeting, with staff and consultants laying out a choice between a roughly $50 million new-build and a series of renovation or expansion alternatives.

CFO Richard Jackson summarized tax-rate scenarios tied to different project sizes, telling council the largest option would add “about 7.5¢ on the debt rate” in one presented scenario. Mayor/Chair (speaker 2) pressed on affordability and the unanswered question of ancillary costs, which staff estimated at about $8 million. The mayor framed the trade-offs plainly: “We have to acknowledge that that’s in our midst, and we gotta deal with it,” he said.

Consultants described two tracks: a smaller renovation plan that focuses on ADA compliance and cosmetic upgrades (about $1.01 million) and a more comprehensive reconfiguration estimate (about $5.9 million) that excludes site work. Staff warned that demolition, utilities and moving costs would likely be additional expenses and noted that staging, relocation and furniture/fixtures remain to be budgeted.

Council discussed timing for a potential bond election and the legal deadline to call a November election (Aug. 17). Several members said the compressed calendar and outstanding engineering and drainage questions weigh against rushing a November ballot. The mayor asked staff to prepare an ordinance calling a $50 million election and return to the council at the Aug. 10 budget meeting to finalize details; staff will also explore lower-cost alternatives and grant opportunities.

What’s next: Staff will prepare the ordinance drafts and follow up with more detailed cost and drainage analyses; council signaled a desire for more time to resolve ancillary-cost and utility questions before a binding vote on calling an election.