Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Developer Infrastructure Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Candidate and resident raises concern over inconsistent developer road obligations
Summary
A resident and mayoral candidate urged transparency in distribution of meeting materials and questioned why some developers paid to pave roads while others appeared not to, citing specific local streets and calling the practice unfair.
At the council meeting’s public comment period, David Pritzloff, who identified himself and gave a Farmington address, said candidates and residents should be provided the same meeting materials as councilors and raised a complaint about inconsistent developer road obligations.
Pritzloff recounted attending a planning commission workshop and said he was cut off when asking whether the city had changed its policy on when developers must construct and pave streets. He pointed to 220th Street as not being paved despite nearby development, contrasting that with 225th Street in Executive Estates, which he said was paved by the developer. "Is the taxpayers gonna be on the hook for that road out there?" he asked, and called such differential treatment "not fair at all." The mayor thanked Pritzloff for his comments; no formal staff response or policy change was recorded at the meeting.
