Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Quasi Judicial Hearings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Garner releases guide to quasi‑judicial hearings to help applicants and neighbors
Summary
Legal intern Jessica Lally presented a new tri‑fold guide explaining quasi‑judicial hearings, who has standing, and the three prongs of admissible evidence to help applicants and residents prepare for land‑use proceedings.
Get email alerts on the Quasi Judicial Hearings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Jessica Lally, a legal intern, presented a tri‑fold participant guide for quasi‑judicial hearings at the Town of Garner council meeting on Aug. 4. She told the council the guide describes what a quasi‑judicial hearing is and who may participate, and it outlines hearing process steps from staff presentations to applicant evidence, public testimony, board questioning and written decisions.
"A quasi judicial hearing is a public hearing used to decide certain municipal matters where the governing board acts like a court," Lally said, and she walked the council through three prongs of evidence: competent, material and sufficient. The guide advises that competent evidence be trustworthy (for example, firsthand knowledge), that material evidence relate to the legal standard at issue (site plans or professional reports), and that sufficient evidence support a finding relevant to the required standard (for example, licensed surveyor or engineer testimony).
Council members praised the clarity of the handout and suggested highlighting the expert‑testimony requirement for traffic and property‑value impacts to avoid confusing lay witnesses. The guide also includes hearing tips — speak only after recognition by the mayor or chair, address the board not the audience, remain respectful and stay on topic — and staff said they will post a digital copy and include the information in board packets so applicants and residents can find it with agendas.
The presentation was informational only; council took no formal action.

