Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Local Finance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Bladen County commissioners hear sharp questions over 0.25¢ sales-tax plan for new community facility

Bladen County Board of Commissioners · August 4, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Commissioners and residents pressed officials on whether a proposed 0.25¢ sales-tax referendum could cover a proposed community facility’s costs, with speakers citing a $24.5 million construction estimate and warning that the tax’s revenue is legally restricted to referendum-specified uses.

Bladen County commissioners on Aug. 3 faced sustained public comment and commissioner questioning about a proposed 0.25¢ sales-tax referendum intended to fund a new community facility. The chair said construction estimates raised affordability concerns: "It's $350 a square foot times 70,000 square feet. That's $24,500,000 just for the building," and asked how roughly $600,000 a year in sales-tax revenue would service that scale of debt.

Commissioner Peterson urged restraint and noted legal limits on how referendum proceeds may be used: "The money has to be specifically used for whatever your referendum says," he said, adding that actual facility size could be scaled based on revenue projections. Several residents and small-business owners argued the tax would largely be paid by out-of-county visitors, not local property owners, with one business owner noting that "90% of their traffic pretty much is out of county and out of state," to argue for a sales-tax approach rather than a property tax increase.

Supporters said the tax would enable a long-term asset for youth and community events; critics warned of competing county needs such as water-system repairs and building maintenance. Multiple speakers urged the commissioners to provide clearer, detailed cost estimates and a plan for how referendum language would restrict and prioritize spending before asking voters to approve the tax.

The board did not take a final vote on a referendum at the meeting and directed staff to continue analysis and community outreach. Next steps include follow-up financial modeling and clarifying the referendum’s wording and allowable uses.