Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Vendor Evaluation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Reviewers say StreamGo Water proposal lacked local permitting detail and references
Summary
Committee members found StreamGo Water's proposal light on landfill-specific experience, site-specific permitting timelines, and accurate reference contact information; StreamGo's price of $11,334,450 produced a total score of 46.23.
Reviewers criticized StreamGo Water’s proposal for lacking locally relevant landfill experience and clear documentation for permitting and contingency plans. "The projects with landfill set up for municipal solid waste were not directly addressed... I didn't see local projects even though they're local," Eli Alvarado said during the evaluation.
Danny Gallagher said he had difficulty obtaining usable references from StreamGo's proposal and suggested procurement follow up to verify contacts. Reviewers acknowledged StreamGo described PFAS removal capabilities but noted that PFAS was not an immediate concern for the county. StreamGo's price of $11,334,450 produced 23.23 price points and a committee total score of 46.23, ranking StreamGo third in the evaluation.
