Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Bond Measure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board accepts updated facility master plan, directs staff to prepare $6.1M bond resolution
Summary
Trustees approved an updated facility master plan outlining priorities to complete the main building and deferred maintenance. After consultant presentations and public comment, the board directed staff to prepare a $6.1M bond resolution (about $35 per $100,000 assessed value) for consideration at the June 23 meeting.
Get email alerts on the Bond Measure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The board reviewed an updated facility master plan required for state modernization funding and discussed options, costs and financing scenarios. A facilities presenter summarized project options and estimated costs, saying the main building phase completion options totalled roughly $2.5 million for basic completion and that other renovation options add to a larger capital need (Presenter, SEG 1891-1900; SEG 1916-1924).
Financial advisor John Isom presented bond scenarios and tax-rate illustrations. He explained the menu of options and tax-rate tradeoffs, noting: "To just do the basic main building, it would require a tax rate of $15 per $100,000 of assessed value," and described larger packages and corresponding tax rates up to $48 per $100,000 for the most comprehensive option (John Isom, SEG 2468-2496).
After extended discussion and public comment, trustees settled on directing staff to prepare a resolution for a $6.1 million bond (roughly $35 per $100,000 assessed value) for consideration at the next meeting, with the ability to revise the amount before the August 7 submittal deadline. The Board President stated his preference for that middle amount: "My recommendation would be for the $35 amount," and trustees agreed staff should prepare the draft resolution for board action at the June 23 meeting (Board President, SEG 3282-3284; SEG 3550-3564).
The master plan presentation also identified $3.1 million in deferred maintenance projects and noted potential state modernization eligibility and modest projected developer fee revenue; the presenter said the capital plan showed a net deficit when current revenue assumptions were applied, highlighting the need for careful bond sizing and programming decisions (Presenter, SEG 1956-1974).

