Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ag Education Bill Hb1536 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House Agriculture Committee advances Ag Innovation Education bill after amendment amid funding concerns
Summary
The House Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee voted 11–5 to advance House Bill 15-36, the Ag Innovation Education Initiative, after consolidating amendments; members and a public witness raised concerns about a $2 million recurring fiscal note and duplicating existing extension and education programs.
Get email alerts on the Ag Education Bill Hb1536 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The House Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee voted 11–5 to advance House Bill 15-36 as amended, sending the measure to the Government Operations Committee.
Representative Shaw, sponsor of the bill, described the measure as an “Ag Innovation Education Initiative” intended to broaden agricultural education, digital innovation and workforce preparation across the state. Shaw said the consolidated amendment mainly changes a reporting date and that the program aims to "structure agriculture" and reduce waste by coordinating scattered efforts.
Opponents emphasized cost and duplication. Representative Halsey argued the bill "adds more layers of government," cited existing programs such as the University of Tennessee extension, Tennessee State University agriculture education, the Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education program, and the AI Tennessee initiative, and said the proposal risks favoring large firms over small farmers. Representative Fritz said she supported the intent but opposed the public–private partnership language and said she would vote no.
Representative Jones pressed the sponsor on the bill's $2,000,000 recurring fiscal note, asking "is there any idea where the $2,000,000 will be coming from every year?" Shaw did not identify a specific funding source, saying implementation details would be determined by the implementing department and reviewed by the comptroller.
A member of the public, Bernadette Pager, testified against the allocation, saying Tennessee already "maintains a robust multi-agency ecosystem" and that the private entities likely to qualify appeared limited — she cited the Tennessee Farm Bureau — arguing she did "not feel comfortable giving $2,000,000 to an entity that already" has substantial resources and urged members to vote no.
After a motion for the previous question ended debate, the clerk reported the recorded vote as "11 ayes, 5 nays." The chair announced that House Bill 15-36 as amended "moves on to Government Operations Committee."
Looking ahead, the bill will be considered next in Government Operations, where members may further scrutinize the fiscal note, implementation language, and the agency role in awarding any grants or contracts.
