Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission advances expedited Sweetgrass park plat; developer to donate parkland and pursue private recreation site
Summary
Commission approved the A & H Park at Sweetgrass expedited preliminary/final plat (PUDC-26-126) covering roughly 91.29 acres that would create a 45-acre public park to be donated to the city and an approximate 30-acre southern parcel proposed for a private indoor recreation developer; the commission asked the governing body to review timing of development agreements and roadway security.
The Cheyenne Planning Commission voted July 6 to forward the A & H Park at Sweetgrass expedited plat (PUDC-26-126) to the governing body, approving staff-recommended exceptions and conditions and adding language asking the governing body to review the timing of development agreements and roadway security instruments.
Staff said the expedited plat encompasses roughly 91.29 acres in the Sweetcrest area and proposes six lots: two for recreational development (including a northern parcel intended as a public city park), a greenway lot, two remainder lots along Loving Trail, and a separate utility/ metering-station lot. "This is proposed south of East College Drive and west of Sweetcrest Drive," Connor White said, and staff noted the area is designated for open space and parks on the future land-use map.
The applicant — identified in the staff prompt as Casey — told the commission Sweetgrass plans to donate roughly 45 acres on the north end as a public park and to convey just under 30 acres on the south end to a private recreation developer that is reportedly interested in building an indoor field-house-style facility. "The northern 45 acres would be a public city park," the applicant said; regarding the southern parcel the applicant added that if the private recreation deal does not occur the PUD allows limited alternative development but the intent is recreational use.
A central disagreement among commissioners and staff centered on sequencing: under the Unified Development Code a plat typically requires plans and security (bond or development agreement) for public improvements before recording. The applicant requested flexibility, proposing that the triggering event be tied to a later development action (for example, a building permit) rather than to recordation. Staff and the director suggested the planning commission forward the plat with the existing conditions but request the governing body evaluate roadway security timing. "I think it's okay to move forward with it subject to staff's recommendation," Development Director Charles Blumpline said, proposing specific language to ask the governing body to review timing.
Commissioner Tony Laird moved to approve the expedited plat and advance the final plat to the governing body with staff-recommended exceptions and conditions; he later proposed an amendment adding the director's suggested language about timing of public and private improvements within the development agreement. The amendment passed on roll call and the main motion as amended carried on a recorded roll-call vote.
Why it matters: the plat would establish land parcels designated for a future city park and a private recreation campus in South Cheyenne; the commission explicitly asked the governing body to weigh whether roadway and utility improvements must be secured before recordation or may be tied to future development actions.
