Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Data Centers topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee delays data-center infrastructure bill amid concerns about local impacts
Summary
Lawmakers debated House Bill 18-47, which would require data centers to cover infrastructure costs; sponsors say the bill protects ratepayers while supporters urge safeguards so local projects are not unduly constrained. The sponsor asked to roll the bill two weeks for language changes.
Representative Butler introduced House Bill 18‑47, saying the measure is intended to let Tennessee welcome data centers while placing “a few guardrails” so those facilities cover the infrastructure costs they create. He told the committee the bill is “not to be against data centers. We want data centers in Tennessee.”
Several members pressed the sponsor on how the bill would treat infrastructure that serves broader public needs. Representative Vaughn cautioned that some improvements — such as substations or bridges — may benefit many residents and not only a data center, and said he does not want to “handcuff local officials” in their decisions. Sponsor Butler asked to roll the bill to the next calendar so staff and members can draft language addressing proportionality and incentives; the chair agreed to a two‑week roll.
Why it matters: the bill aims to protect ratepayers by ensuring data centers contribute to related infrastructure, but lawmakers flagged the risk of limiting local flexibility when infrastructure serves multiple users. The sponsor said he will craft language to allow appropriate economic‑development incentives to remain usable in certain industrial‑park scenarios.
Provenance: transcript segments introducing and closing the discussion appear in committee debate beginning with the bill introduction and ending with the roll request (topicintro: SEG 082; topfinish: SEG 337).
