Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Open Meetings topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

New district counsel gives Brown Act refresher to Los Olivos board

Los Olivos Community Services District · February 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its Feb. 12 meeting the Los Olivos Community Services District heard a Brown Act overview from recently introduced counsel Martin Kazanovich, who reviewed open‑meeting rules, serial‑meeting prohibitions and social‑media guidance for directors.

Martin Kazanovich, the district’s newly introduced legal counsel, delivered a detailed Brown Act refresher to the Los Olivos Community Services District on Feb. 12 as the board opened its regular meeting. Kazanovich reviewed what constitutes a meeting, the requirement that publicly noticed agendas be posted before action, and the prohibition on serial or ‘hub‑and‑spoke’ communications that result in a quorum deliberating outside an agendized session.

The counsel emphasized how communications on social media and chain emails can trigger Brown Act obligations and cited a court case where a public official’s brief blocking of a constituent on Facebook was treated as using the account as a public forum. “Outside of an open publicly noticed meeting, a quorum of the legislative body may not meet and consult or discuss district business,” Kazanovich said during his remarks. He also reviewed possible remedies for violations — including do‑overs, nullification of actions and, in intentional cases, potential penalties — and answered directors’ questions about recent legislative changes and the temporary extension of remote‑meeting permissions.

Board members thanked Kazanovich and used the Q&A to clarify how the rules apply to posting materials and to interactions with constituents. Directors asked specifically about the continuing effect of 2020 changes to online communications and the status of a pending bill to extend remote meeting allowances; counsel said he was not aware of substantive new restrictions since 2020 but noted a pending bill to extend certain remote‑attendance provisions. The board agreed to keep Brown Act guidance in mind while preparing spreadsheets and shared documents ahead of future meetings.