Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Local Indicators topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

District presentation shows mixed English-learner progress; South Almani among lower-performing sites

Board of Trustees of the El Monte Union High School District · June 19, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District staff presented local indicators and site-level English-learner progress: Almani (50.7% progress), Arroyo (37.5% progress), Rosemead (48.3% maintained), Fernando Ledesma (14.9%), and South Almani (32% with a 7.4-point decline). Trustees requested site breakdowns and clarification of the dashboard status-change methodology.

Edith Echeverria presented the El Monte Union High School District’s local indicators and explained how the dashboard measures both status and change across 11 indicators (six state, five local). She said the local indicators in this cycle generally show standards met in the categories presented and reviewed metrics for basic services, implementation of state standards and school climate.

During board questioning, Echeverria and staff provided site-level English-learner progress percentages and explained how the dashboard couples status and change. She said Arroyo had 37.5% of ELs making progress (orange status), Almani showed 50.7% making progress with a 9.7% increase (green), Fernando Ledesma had 14.9% progress (orange), Rosemead was at 48.3% and effectively maintained (yellow), and South Almani had 32% of ELs making progress and declined 7.4 points (red). “When you look at Almani, they made significant progress, 9.7%, and they have a total of 50.7% of students making progress. That’s why they were green,” Echeverria said.

Trustees requested staff pull site-specific dashboards for further review and asked for additional context on how prior-year data informed decisions. One trustee cautioned that the data used to approve staffing decisions were drawn from prior years’ submissions, a point staff acknowledged and said the district will certify the dashboard in November.