Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Site Selection topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners debate which school zones need cameras; statute, signage and equity raised
Summary
Commissioners questioned why some camera locations (e.g., 19th Street near Northside) were included despite limited school activity, discussed four‑way stop effects and possible reassignments to higher‑risk corridors; staff said statutory limits on school‑zone definitions constrain location choices.
Commissioners spent substantial time reviewing why certain sites appear on the Red Speed deployment list and whether cameras should operate all day or only during school hours. Commissioner Hughes pointed to Holy Nativity as an example where new four‑way stops reduced violations to zero and asked why similar locations remain on the deployment list.
Commissioner Hughes said some sites, including stretches of 19th Street, are 500 feet from drop‑off areas but have little direct school activity. "When these roads have no interaction with school, why do we look at those?" he asked. Staff and the vendor said the cameras mirror existing statutory school‑zone boundaries and advised the commission that changing zone designations would likely require coordination with the county or school district.
Some commissioners suggested reassigning assets from low‑violation sites to corridors with higher pedestrian risk, such as Harrison Avenue or Cherry Street; the vendor said reassignments "can absolutely be done" but might require additional meetings to address timing and logistics. Staff agreed to check statutory conditions and report back.
