Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pembroke Meadows topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Pembroke Meadows cluster plan heads to Housing Appeals Board; zoning denial raises density questions
Summary
The developer behind Pembroke Meadows appealed a zoning denial and faces an early-August hearing before the Housing Appeals Board; the planning board cautioned members not to discuss attorney-client privileged details and noted the developer may pursue a conventional subdivision as a backup.
Board members were briefed on Pembroke Meadows, a developer-led proposal that sought a compact cluster layout and drew zoning pushback. A board member described the developer’s plan as an attempt to place about "100 homes on a single lot" by reducing frontage, setbacks and spacing between buildings; the zoning board denied the cluster approach based on a claimed financial hardship, and the developer has scheduled a Housing Appeals Board (HAB) hearing in early August.
Staff told the planning board that the HAB has 60 days to make a decision and that the developer is pursuing a second track — a conventional subdivision plan — as a fallback. Members repeatedly cautioned against discussing privileged legal advice in public because the matter is active and could proceed to court. Staff said the HAB pre-hearing occurred this morning and confirmed the HAB hearing date.
The board also discussed whether local zoning rules need clearer language on how many units may be allowed on a single lot; one member observed that the zoning table and a stand-alone line in the ordinance seem to conflict about whether multiple residences may be added on one parcel and suggested the board review cluster development language from Concord for ideas.
Next steps: the HAB hearing is scheduled for early August; staff will watch whether the developer files a conventional subdivision concept or a TRC submission for planning review in July or fall.
