Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Agrarian Conservation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

5 Rivers, landowners and Pembroke discuss conserving a working farm under NRCS ALE program

Pembroke Conservation Commission · June 8, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

5 Rivers told the commission the property meets NRCS ALE criteria for prime soils and low forest cover; presenters said the easement's primary goal is to protect working farmland rather than create new public recreation access.

Representatives from 5 Rivers, partnering with the landowners, presented a conservation proposal focused on permanently protecting a working farm in Pembroke through an Agricultural Land Easement (ALE) funded partly by NRCS.

A 5 Rivers representative explained the selection criteria for NRCS ALE funds—prime agricultural soils, percentage forest cover limits and a landowner willing to accept restrictions—and said the property qualifies. "When we heard about this project, it came to us as an agricultural opportunity. This is one of the last working farms in this town that has a long agricultural history," the representative said, framing the project around protecting farmland under development pressure.

Landowners who attended reiterated their motivation is permanent conservation rather than profit: a landowner told commissioners their priority is protecting the land for the Pembroke community. Commissioners discussed easement design details—what land is excluded (house and barns), potential building envelopes, allowable agricultural uses, and how NRCS easement language can be specific and restrictive. The group also discussed how federal funding often requires conservation uses to be documented and how funding partners (local, federal and private) would share costs.

Commissioners asked about public access and whether federal funds would require the land to be opened for recreation. Presenters said agricultural easements often focus on farming uses; public access is not always required and would be determined by easement terms negotiated among landowners, 5 Rivers and NRCS.