Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Rezoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning commission recommends Vail rezone from agriculture to agricultural‑residential over neighbor objections

Elbert County Planning Commission · August 5, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission voted to recommend rezoning a 35‑acre parcel to allow 10‑acre minimum lots; nearby residents argued the change breaks an established 35‑acre subdivision pattern and sets an undesirable precedent.

The Planning Commission recommended approval of RZ‑2026‑0002, a request to rezone a 35‑acre parcel at 43248 Meadowbrook Circle from Agriculture to Agricultural‑Residential, allowing 10‑acre minimum lot sizes.

Planner Danny Klebanner explained the property is located in the Meadowbrook Ranches subdivision (9 lots of 35 acres each) and is surrounded by lots ranging from 5 to 35 acres. Staff said referral agencies—including Rattlesnake Fire Protection District, the county sheriff and emergency management—raised no objections and that the Division of Water Resources reviewed the applicant’s water supply and augmentation plan. The staff recommendation noted that building permits, septic review and public‑works checks will still be required at the time of development.

At the public hearing, neighbor John Steven Jones urged denial, saying the community was built on the expectation of 35‑acre lots and that subdividing within the recorded neighborhood sets a precedent that could lead to further fragmentation. Owner Hubert De Gary, who said he maintains the private Meadowbrook Circle road, replied that the county’s regulations allow the subdivision and that he and his family intend to remain and maintain the road.

Commissioner (S14) moved to recommend approval with staff‑proposed conditions; the motion passed by roll call (8 ayes, 0 nays). The recommendation will be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners for final action and recordation conditions.