Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ethics And Accountability topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Student trustee raises concern over an intermittently absent trustee; staff says removal requires rare state action
Summary
A student trustee raised concerns that a fellow trustee was not participating; trustees discussed accountability options and staff explained board bylaws allow deeming abandonment after three missed meetings but that removal would typically require attorney general intervention.
During the workshop, a student trustee (identified in the transcript as Ash) raised a concern that a trustee from a particular district—referred to in remarks as Ed or Acosta—had rarely participated and might be neglecting duties. Ash said the lack of participation left parts of the county underrepresented and asked whether the board could address it internally.
Staff responded that the board’s bylaws include a provision that missing three meetings in a row could be deemed abandonment, but any formal removal of an elected official would normally require state-level intervention. As staff summarized, such an intervention “would require intervention from the attorney general at the state level to remove somebody from office” and that historically the state rarely takes that step except in criminal or serious conflict-of-interest cases. Trustees acknowledged the concern and discussed outreach and relationship-based approaches as an initial path rather than immediate legal action.
