Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Community Grants topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission adopts 80% minimum qualifying score for two‑year community grants
Summary
After staff recommended a 70% minimum, the commission voted 5–2 to adopt an 80% qualifying threshold for the two‑year community services grants, a change that would exclude one applicant (Benicia Unified School District) but increase awards for other local nonprofits.
Get email alerts on the Community Grants topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Benicia Community Services Commission voted to set an 80% minimum qualifying score for awards under the two‑year community services grant program for fiscal years 2026–27, passing the motion 5–2 in a roll call vote.
Wendy Stratton Monaghan, senior management analyst with the Benicia Police Department, presented staff's recommendation and the funding formula. "So, the recommendation that's being forwarded is to move to vote on funding levels for the community services community grant covering the next 2 fiscal years, fiscal year 26 and 27," Stratton Monaghan said, explaining that staff had proposed a 70% minimum but also provided an alternative 80% threshold. She said the city calculated awards proportionally to each applicant's aggregate score and that, because of limited funding, the total available would cover roughly 74.99% of requested amounts in aggregate.
Commissioners debated whether the commission should prioritize funding more applicants at lower levels (the 70% option) or concentrate larger awards to fewer groups (the 80% option). After discussion, Commissioner Sachs moved to support Option B (the 80% threshold); the motion was seconded and passed by roll call (five yes, two no). "I guess I believe the motion passes," the chair said after the tally.
The vote means all applicants that scored at or above 80% will receive funding according to the staff formula; applicants below that threshold will be ineligible. Staff said the full calculation will be included in the packet and that grantees who wish to review their scores can do so through the public materials and, in future cycles, expect clearer feedback.
