Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Municipal Ethics topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Selectboard holds hearing but stands by earlier removal of Planning Commission member Rama Schneider

Williamstown Selectboard · January 12, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Williamstown Selectboard held a public hearing Jan. 12 after complaints from the Vermont lieutenant governor's office about repeated abusive emails by Planning Commission member Rama Schneider; Schneider defended his statements, but the board kept its Dec. 22 rescission in place.

The Williamstown Selectboard on Jan. 12 held a public hearing to review its Dec. 22, 2025 decision to rescind the appointment of Planning Commission member Rama Schneider after town staff relayed concerns from the Office of the Vermont Lieutenant Governor about repeated hostile communications. Chair Larry Hebert said the lieutenant governor's chief of staff had contacted town staff about what he described as "behavior unbecoming of an appointed public official," and Hebert read three emails attributed to Schneider dated April 11, May 20 and Dec. 13, 2025 outlining the complaints.

Schneider addressed the board at the hearing and said he "wholeheartedly stood behind my statements; they might not be liked in how they were said or that they were said but I meant every intent of them." He told the board he has a long record of community service in Williamstown and argued that the town's Code of Ethics does not cover private political speech. The board reiterated that the rescission vote was taken at an executive session on Dec. 22 because staff had documented roughly a dozen incidents over about ten months; the Selectboard said the repeated nature of the communications made the matter more serious than a single exchange and that members did not want to put the individual "on display." The hearing ended at 7:00 p.m. with no change to the prior decision.