Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Memphis-Shelby County Schools presents amended FY27 budget, commission presses for detailed line items and clarity on oversight costs
Summary
Memphis-Shelby County Schools presented an amended FY27 operating and capital budget that adds deferred maintenance and fund-balance assignments; commissioners pressed for a detailed line-item budget, clarification on oversight-board costs and confirmation of funding availability before final approval.
Get email alerts on the School Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Memphis-Shelby County Schools officials presented an amended operating and capital budget to the commission, explaining why the district revised figures to include deferred maintenance and other fund-balance assignments.
Chief Tito Langston said the school board adopted a preliminary budget in May and later amended it in July to add approximately $11.9 million for deferred maintenance and other fund-balance assignments totaling roughly $104 million. Langston said the amendment was intended to avoid delays in submitting the template to the state and to reflect capital changes the county had approved on June 29. "So again, this is just an amended budget," Langston said, outlining adjustments that include carryovers and capital allocations.
Commissioners asked multiple questions about who pays for the oversight board, whether prior unfunded state mandates were accounted for, and why commissioners had not received the district's line-item materials directly. Director of Administration & Finance Audrey Tipton said the county had not yet submitted the final packet to the state and that the administration had been working with the district on form and structure. Several commissioners pressed for an itemized line-item budget and a clear accounting of the maintenance-of-effort (MOE) and contingency impacts before final approval.
The committee considered a substitute resolution reflecting the amended figures and, after discussion, moved the substitute forward with three aye votes, two no votes and one recusal recorded; staff and district representatives committed to provide detailed line-item budgets, breakdowns of capital allocations by year and other requested exhibits for the full commission.
