Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Opioid Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee updates pain-clinic rules to reduce repeated remedial burdens on specialists
Summary
Committee adopted an amendment to revise pain clinic oversight—redefining high-risk prescriber criteria, changing on-site medical director requirements to quarterly, allowing telephone coverage by qualified pain specialists, and requiring expungement of a high-risk label after remedial compliance; bill advanced to calendar.
Dr. Briggs, testifying to the Health and Welfare Committee, said the amendment making up the pain-clinic bill updates long-standing rules to reflect the modern practice of qualified pain specialists and to avoid redundant remedial requirements.
Briggs said the state has reduced the number of problematic 'pill mill' clinics over the past decade and that current law sometimes singled out legitimate pain specialists as high-risk prescribers. He explained the amendment requires the Department to remove a prescriber from a high-risk listing once they provide proof of completing required remedial coursework and updates an on-site medical director requirement from weekly presence to a quarterly standard. "This is a very good bill," Briggs told the committee, describing changes to allow telephone coverage by a qualified pain management person and to clarify statutory criteria.
Committee members probed how the high-risk prescriber designation would be determined; Briggs said the new language considers clinical outcomes and that the Department still monitors for overdoses and other adverse outcomes. The committee adopted the amendment and the bill was placed on the calendar.
