Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Building Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners press for building-code or local-ordinance fixes after videos show inaccessible amenities in new buildings
Summary
Commissioners and delegates discussed gaps in construction codes that leave residents unable to use internal amenities (trash rooms, fitness rooms, party rooms) and considered legislative study, local ordinance authority and tax incentives to increase accessibility.
Get email alerts on the Building Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners presented videos and local examples showing that newly built multi-unit housing in Arlington can be inaccessible inside — meaning residents pay for amenities they cannot use because doors, trash rooms or fitness areas are not accessible.
"The issue is that people cannot — they're paying for this, but there's a condominium... that's not accessible for the internal use of people with disabilities," Commissioner Maryland said, summarizing the briefing she prepared and the videos documenting difficulties with doors, trash rooms and garages.
Delegates and commissioners discussed options: amend the state building code during its upcoming review, authorize local ordinances for new builds, or broaden the livable-home tax credit to make retrofits affordable. Delegate Hope noted retrofitting costs are higher than building accessibility up front and suggested exploring tax-credit modifications or a local incentive program. Commissioner Laura Kim urged legislative support for the affirmative-defense bill that had been vetoed and for broader funding for support workers and rental assistance.
Maryland reported a retrofit she oversaw cost roughly $45,000 for one building retrofit, and delegates discussed whether the current livable-home credit cap (about $10,000) is sufficient for rental or developer-aimed modifications.
Commissioners agreed to push the issue in their August priority letter to the County Board and to pursue conversations with building-code reviewers and the General Assembly committees that will consider code updates.

