Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Regional Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners flag legal, financial risks before backing Greeley-led Cascadia request
Summary
Commissioners pulled a Greeley-requested item from the consent agenda and debated whether Weld County should provide a moral‑obligation backstop and a $20.9 million zero‑interest subordinated loan for the Cascadia project, citing constitutional limits on pledging county credit and long repayment timelines.
The Weld County Board of County Commissioners removed a Greeley‑sponsored project from the consent agenda after commissioners raised concerns the county would assume long‑term financial risk.
The chair told colleagues the county was being asked both to “backstop the project's bond reserve through a so‑called moral obligation” and to authorize a $20,900,000 zero‑interest loan subordinate to bondholders. The chair said that while the obligation may not be legally binding in court, it was intended to be binding in financial markets and warned that “different label does not make the risk disappear.”
Why it matters: Commissioners said the request could use Weld County’s AAA credit reputation to help the project’s financing, which they argued could expose taxpayers to contingent risk and set a precedent for future municipal partnerships.
Commissioner Jason Maxey said he was enthusiastic about the region’s potential economic gains but opposed county participation as beyond the proper role of county government. He said the proposal resembled debt because it would use county credit and require future appropriations in support of bondholders. Commissioner Perry Buck acknowledged the project’s potential tourism and economic benefits but said the board faced a difficult decision.
Commissioner Kevin Ross asked that the item be removed from the consent agenda for discussion and placed his concerns on the record; the board discussed legal questions tied to the Colorado Constitution about pledging county credit. Commissioners noted the project’s financial model projects a roughly $670 million nominal county return over 37 years and that modeled repayments to the county do not begin until about 2045.
The board did not approve county participation during the meeting; the item was pulled for discussion and further vetting of legal and financial implications. No formal commitment or appropriation was made during the session.
