Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Personnel Compensation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Kalkaska personnel panel reviews $139,460 Administrator/CFO pay comparison; considers contract option

Kalkaska County Board of Commissioners Personnel Special Committee ยท May 28, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Personnel Special Committee reviewed a compensation comparison showing a $139,460 total cost for the former Administrator/CFO and a recommended $139,460 contractual package with no county benefits, and discussed whether to hire the next Administrator/CFO as an employee or a contractor.

The Kalkaska County Board of Commissioners Personnel Special Committee reviewed recommendations for filling the County Administrator/CFO vacancy during a meeting called to order by Chair Scott Matley at 10:02 a.m. on May 28. Matley provided a graph comparing former Administrator/CFO compensation and proposed options; the document listed the former employee total cost at $139,460.00 and a recommended contractual package at $139,460.00 with no county benefits.

Committee members noted the former contract referenced a 7.9% retirement-fund contribution rather than an 8.6% figure that had been circulated. Commissioners debated whether offering a contractual arrangement without benefits could yield cost savings while still making the position competitive enough to retain a qualified Administrator/CFO. Robert Baldwin said a contractual position could produce savings and that the recommended wage might be negotiable in the contracting process; Jeff Sieting suggested sheriff wage and stipend issues should be addressed separately with the incoming sheriff.

Clerk Deborah Hill outlined that any employee-side negotiations will follow comparison-county processes during upcoming union negotiations. The committee discussed advertising the vacancy and whether to recruit for an employee position or a contractual post; they did not make a final hiring decision at the meeting but agreed further consideration was required. The committee recorded consensus to consider a special meeting on June 4 to finalize pay, benefits, job description and advertising plans.

The meeting record shows public participation on Zoom from Annie Wallace, who "noted good discussion," and the committee adjourned at 10:55 a.m. after a motion by Robert Baldwin supported by Jeff Sieting; the adjournment carried 3โ€“0.