Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Reserve Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council discusses cutting reserves to 40% to free money for staffing; staff to provide analysis
Summary
Mayor Pro Tem Bonner urged lowering the general-fund reserve target from the current 50% (six months) to 40% to fund staff and supplementary requests; staff cautioned recurring personnel costs are risky and agreed to prepare an analysis for the next meeting.
Mayor Pro Tem Bonner pressed the council to consider lowering the undesignated fund-balance target from 50% (six months) to 40% so the city could use part of the reserve to fund supplemental needs, including staff. "I would like to see us lower that to 40% instead of 50%," Bonner said, estimating that shift would free roughly $2.7 million for one-time needs and personnel.
Finance staff and the city manager urged caution. Dan warned that using fund balance for recurring personnel would create a funding shortfall in future years: "I would hesitate to fund personnel because that's a reoccurring charge... we would have to come up with the funds next year again and the year after that." Council directed staff to return with a formal analysis that shows long- and short-term impacts and recommended uses of any freed funds. The mayor asked for the analysis to include what the city would fund if the target were lowered and the long-term implications for fiscal sustainability.
Council signaled openness to exploring the change: the mayor suggested placing an item on the next agenda for staff recommendation and analysis. "Let's get an analysis done. What would be the long term, short term impacts?" Mayor Davis asked.
The discussion left the policy question open; staff indicated any formal change would be made by resolution and brought back to council for a vote.
