Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Solid Waste Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Selectboard debates future of transfer station: rebuild canopies or stop taking construction waste?
Summary
After canopy damage and rising disposal costs, the board discussed scaling back phase‑2 plans and whether to continue accepting heavy construction and demolition debris. Members tasked staff to assemble financial data before deciding on a redesign or new fee structure.
The Select Board reopened discussion of phase 2 of the town’s transfer station after recent damage to canopies and a retaining wall that triggered debate over long‑term policy for construction and demolition (C&D) waste.
Board members and residents noted the transfer station is currently heavily subsidized for C&D disposal, and that repair estimates and maintenance costs can be significant. One participant summarized the fiscal tension: the town “might be $200,000 in all this year just to maintain construction debris,” prompting calls to evaluate alternatives including a single noncommercial bin, redesigned access that discourages contractor drop‑offs, or different pricing to reflect weight‑based costs.
Members asked staff to collect clear financials—tonnage by material, current fees, and contractor patterns—so the board can compare options (keep C&D with a reinforced design and canopies; keep a single, less‑accessible bin for homeowners only; or discontinue C&D acceptance). The board agreed preconstruction coordination and exact quotes from the vendor (Hunter/Casella) are needed before final design decisions; the item will return once staff provides the requested numbers.
