Get email alerts on the Article V Convention topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee debates Article V ‘faithful-delegate’ bill; amendment fails and bill rolled for two weeks
Summary
Lawmakers debated SB15-67, which would expand Tennessee’s faithful-delegate law (Title 3, ch. 18) to specify selection, instructions and penalties for commissioners to an Article V amending convention. An amendment failed on roll call and the committee deferred the bill for two weeks after extended questioning about enforcement and separation-of-powers concerns.
Get email alerts on the Article V Convention topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate Bill 15-67, a rewrite and expansion of Tennessee’s faithful-delegate statute for a potential Article V amending convention, drew extensive committee discussion and outside testimony. The sponsor described the measure as clarifying commissioner selection, instruction, oversight and qualifications; two three-minute witnesses from Convention of States groups urged passage and outlined proposed safeguards including commissioner qualifications, odd-numbered delegations, roll-call voting and recall mechanisms.
Members pressed witnesses and the sponsor on enforcement, recall mechanics, whether the legislature can lawfully constrain delegates’ votes, and the practical limits of recalling or prosecuting a commissioner after a convention vote. Witnesses cited Chiafalo v. United States as precedent that states can impose penalties on agents who break instructions, and sponsors noted existing Title 3, Chapter 18 provisions and prior amendments. The committee held a roll-call on a drafting-code amendment; the amendment failed (3 ayes, 5 noes) and the bill was placed on committee roll for two weeks.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
