Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Supply topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Spring City weighs drilling test well and other options to fix water-source deficit
Summary
Council heard a detailed presentation on options to address a state-identified source-capacity shortfall — a test well (data and pump test), a transmission-line connection, or piecemeal hydrant and readiness work — and the trade-offs given roughly $450,000 in remaining contingency funds.
Councilors spent the bulk of the work meeting on a presentation about the city’s water supply and options to fix a state-identified capacity deficit.
Ashley (Presenter S8), the project presenter, told the council that the system currently shows a paper-based shortfall of roughly 100–130 gallons per minute and that any plan must account for emergency fire-flow requirements as well as average use. “So the target would be 3 to 400 gallons a minute,” S8 said as a design target for a new production well.
S8 outlined a phased approach: an environmental clearance (NEPA) and archeological survey, preparation of bid documents, a test-well drilling and test-pump phase to gather geologic and yield data, followed by full production-well design only if the test is successful. S8 said engineering fees in the amendment are budgeted at about $55,000 and that the test-well drilling phase line-item is shown at $33,000; drilling bids for test wells historically range widely but S8 estimated $100,000–$150,000 for typical test drilling.
Council members asked whether purchasing an existing well or buying property for a well site could avoid drilling. S8 cautioned that most farm wells are not constructed to culinary standards (no sanitary seal) and would likely require redrilling or conversion. S8 also outlined that a point-of-diversion change application would be necessary to add a new well to the city’s water rights portfolio and that the change-application process includes a public protest window with an approximate six-month review by the Division of Water Rights.
No formal decision or vote was recorded; council asked staff to continue work on options and to consult the state adviser about moratorium mechanics tied to water-source remedies.
